The bar chart and pie chart represent the information about how the number of males sad females were using the enormous evening courses during 2009 at an education centre coupled with how the distinct age groups were taking participation on these courses.
Generally, in language course,women had maximum amount in comparison with men who were 20 only, whereas, in sculpture course, females were 2 times less than males who lied up to 10. Furthermore, in drama and painting women reached at a peak point that was 25 approximately, but men were 10 and 25 only.
Analysing further, the age group of 50 or above was the largest group whose proportion was less than half of the total percentile and age group of under 20 was 5% , compared with others together with age group of 40-49 was 26% whose was 1% more than quartile proportion. Followed by, the age group of 30-39 and 20-29 who reached upto 16% and 11% respectively.
Overall, it is palpable that woman were taking more participation in different courses and also age group of 50or above was also considered maximum participants than that of the rest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... taking participation on these courses. Generally, in language course,women had ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , women
...rses. Generally, in language course,women had maximum amount in comparison with m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n with men who were 20 only, whereas, in sculpture course, females were 2 times l...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e 10 and 25 only. Analysing further, the age group of 50 or above was the lar...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...centile and age group of under 20 was 5% , compared with others together with age ...
^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with others together with age group of 40-49 was 26% whose was 1% more than qua...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87368421053 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70283869751 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9536874548 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190933977305 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991801382714 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126401259771 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13357999489 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142401977544 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.