The line graph illustrates the information about how distinct types of investigation were conducted especially by the tourist office centre in a peculiar area throughout the six months during 2011.
Initially, direct queries started from above 400 which were 300 less than those enquiries which were done through letter. Between february and march, they intersected with each other at 700 but afterwards, face to face enquiries sky rocketed and become 1900 ,while letter queries gradually declined and reached upto below 400.
Analysing further, on january, telephone enquiries were approximately 850 which were fluctuated and become 1000 on third month which were coeval as on april. After 2 months, its range elevated to 1400 which were little bit less than the figure of direct queries.
Overall, it is palpable that face to face enquiries made the maximum enquiries, whereas the letter queries accounted for the least number than that of the rest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with each other at 700 but afterwards, face to face enquiries sky rocketed and ...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e enquiries sky rocketed and become 1900 ,while letter queries gradually declined ...
^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
..., its range elevated to 1400 which were little bit less than the figure of direct queries....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... than the figure of direct queries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 678.0 965.302439024 70% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46774193548 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59090701638 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.766129032258 0.547539520022 140% => OK
syllable_count: 198.9 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0219939533 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.6 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0771754299093 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04558044839 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735196027828 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072409886934 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843702942334 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.