The above- mentioned pie-chart represents the most determined causes of degradation of agricultural land throughout the world and the possible,three regions impacted by it in the whole period of 1990's.I will evaluated the given whole data in the upcoming paragraphs.
Firstly, over-grazing and deforestation were the main concernable causes that had 35% and 30% share in total percentage of the whole causes. Beside it, over-cultivation was 28% and other causes left with 7% participation in it.
Secondly, europe faced total 23% degraded land over oceania and north-america ,that, had 13% and 5% degraded land area. In oceania, overgrazing had 11.3% share in total degraded proportion and europe and north-america share 9.8% of deforestation and 3.3% of over-cultivation in the whole degraded area.
In the conclusion, it seems to me that over-grazing played an important role in land degradation and it impacted badly to oceania ,while, europe had a large degraded area on over other regions.
The pie chart given informs
The pie chart given informs the main factors of less productive land for agriculture. Meanwhile the table tells the readers about the impacts of the problem to North America, Europe, and Ocenia.
It can be seen from the chart that the most cause of the land degradation is due to the over grazing as it also happens in Oceania (where Australia and New Zealand lie on). Although European land has been degraded mostly compared to the others, the percentage of overgrazing in these places is the highest of all.
The chart says that there are some causes of worldwide land degradation, they can be ranked from the highest percentage to the lowest namely over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation, and other. While in the table of the regions experiencing the land degradation, it shows that North America has only about 5% of its land which has been degraded. This is almost 4 times compared to the European land which has been degraded for almost of its quarter of its land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f agricultural land throughout the world and the possible,three regions impacted ...
^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , three
...d throughout the world and the possible,three regions impacted by it in the whole per...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...cted by it in the whole period of 1990s.I will evaluated the given whole data in ...
^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'evaluate'
Suggestion: evaluate
... it in the whole period of 1990s.I will evaluated the given whole data in the upcoming pa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it. Secondly, europe faced total 23% degraded land over oceania and north-ame...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aded land over oceania and north-america ,that, had 13% and 5% degraded land area....
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le degraded area. In the conclusion, it seems to me that over-grazing played ...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed an important role in land degradation and it impacted badly to oceania ,while,...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dation and it impacted badly to oceania ,while, europe had a large degraded area ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 1615.20841683 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 155.0 315.596192385 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47741935484 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33234393919 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 506.74238477 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.429444632 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.5 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0909980636062 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050532009669 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496485338462 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636664365202 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533101701375 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.