The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010.
The bar chart and pie charts illustrate the percentage of people in Glasgow having three levels of education (university, school and those with no qualifications) in 2010. Information is divided into five age groups in the bar chart and by gender in the pie charts.
Overall, the majority of people with university education were in younger age groups, while in the oldest age group most people did not have any qualifications. The proportions of men and women were similar and showed little different between the levels of education.
The percentage of people with university education was up to 76% in the younger three age groups compared to only 50% in those ages 50 to 75 and just 25% in those over 75. This trend was reversed in those with no qualifications (9% in younger people rising to 72% in the oldest age group). The figure for those with school education was relatively constant at around 20% but was as low as 3% in the over 75's.
The proportion of men and women in each level of education was around one third with only a slightly difference of 3% in university graduates as well as those who didn't have educational qualifications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('difference') instead of another adjective.
...ducation was around one third with only a slightly difference of 3% in university graduates as well a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...iversity graduates as well as those who didnt have educational qualifications.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.765 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82276017401 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0136692799 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142997093728 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749552281111 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745486597415 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108389385046 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847019455675 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.