The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in scotland, in 2010.
The bar graph delineates the people of different age groups of a city name Glasgow in Scotland categorised depending on level of education and the pie chart compares the education levels of both genders males and females in percentage in the year 2010.
Overall, it can be manifested that the proportion of university graduates were significant in all age groups except the people with age above 75.While, the people with no qualification was high in 75+ age group and least in others. Notably, the level of education in women and men was almost same for all ages.
To commence with, the proportion of university degree(71%), school certificate (20%) and uneducated people wre similar for both age groups (16-24) and (35-50) whereas for adults(24-35), thr percentage of university graduates was highest(76%). The 50% of people of 50-75 age had university degree which was doubled than the people of age greater than 75. The people who completed school were least in the people of age group above 75 up to 3% but in 50-75 age people had 20%. There was significant proportion of non-certificate holder in 75+ age group wad up to 72% which wad 42% more than the people of 50-75 ages.
Secondly, the total proportion of people (all ages) without any degree certificate was 38% and 35% in females and males respectively. However, the men percentage was higher in university degree by 3% than women (29%). There are same amount of people in both the genders in school certificate holder with the figures 33%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity name Glasgow in Scotland categorised depending on level of education and the ...
^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...ups except the people with age above 75.While, the people with no qualification was h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ersity degree71%, school certificate 20% and uneducated people wre similar for bo...
^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ee by 3% than women 29%. There are same amount of people in both the genders in school...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88976377953 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76059219041 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464566929134 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3733917628 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751624208401 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435709198277 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101582361725 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941493026498 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139872057205 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.