The charts below give information about the people use the public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of people using public library in 5 main purposes in britain in the year 1991 and 2000.
Overall, most of british people used public library to borrow and return book in both years although the rate of those decreased over the researched period. In addition, only in the year 2000, people in britain visited public library to borrow and return videos.
there was a decline in the proportion of british people who visited public library in order to borrowing and returning book, from 65% in 1991 to 55% in 2000. 18% of visitors to public library in britain to borrow and return videos in 2000.
The percentage of people obtaining information in public library in britain in 1991 was half of that in 2000, 10% compared to 20%. by contrast, there was the same downward trend in the figures for ‘study’ and ‘ read newspaper or magazine’ purpose, by 8% and 10% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...britain in the year 1991 and 2000. Overall, most of british people used pub...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brary to borrow and return videos. there was a decline in the proportion of...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...o borrow and return videos. there was a decline in the proportion of brit...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... borrow and return videos in 2000. The percentage of people obtaining infor...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...f of that in 2000, 10% compared to 20%. by contrast, there was the same downward t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06289308176 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74692329624 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503144654088 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2178117146 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412510969481 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234215252728 0.103423049105 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133120290167 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284404900114 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107477585772 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.