The first bar graph compares the number of marriage and divorce rates from 1970 to 2000. The second graph gives information about the marital status of adult citizens of America in 1970 and 2000. Overall, it can be seen that the rate of marriages have decreased in the period of 30 years. Despite some fluctuations over the period as whole, the divorce rate remained the same. Also, the marital status remained the highest in both years amongst all status.
To begin with, in 1970, the number of marriages was more than double the number of divorces(2.5 millions to 1 million). It continued to be the same for marriages in the year 1980 however, the divorce rates increased by .4 millions thus, reaching a peak in the same year. After that, there was a downfall of marriages reaching the trough in 2000 which was 2 millions. Finally the rate of divorce in 2000 remained the same as in 1970.
There was not much of a change witnessed in the marital status of adult Americans over 30 years. The Americans were at the highest (70%) in 1970 which subsequently declined by 11% to 69% in 2000. We experienced that more number of people of America preferred not to get get married or divorced in the year 2000 than in 1970. In the meanwhile, the widowed Americans in 1970 were 8% and remained almost the same even in 2000.
In conclusion, the rate of marriages have fallen gradually and the number of divorces or those who did not marry have increased slowly over the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The first bar graph compares the number of marriage and divo...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...he trough in 2000 which was 2 millions. Finally the rate of divorce in 2000 remained th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: get
...r of people of America preferred not to get get married or divorced in the year 2000 t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...America preferred not to get get married or divorced in the year 2000 than in 197...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62213740458 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43226819223 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469465648855 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0171069984 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371700006304 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141712839362 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811718052179 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225959326334 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990088890212 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.