The bar graph gives information about four types of transportation ( bus, car, bike, foot) used for commuting in one European city in three different years-1960, 1980, 2000. Overall, car gained its popularity whereas, the number of people on foot decreased gradually.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 1960, traveling on foot was the most popular mode of transport (35%) in comparison to other forms. Bikes were equally important and 28% of people used them. 20% of people commuted by bus while only 8% of them used cars and was the least famous amongst all.
However in the year 1980, people preferred to travel by public transport more often(28%) which was the highest among all the other type of transportation. The percentage of car users grew dramatically reaching at 25% and the bikers declined slowly to around 25%. The people traveling on foot plunged to 18%.
Following that, in 2000, private cars soared and reached a peak of 38%. In contrast , the percentage of bikes reached a trough of 8% which was the same as cars in 1980. Although there was a drop in percentage of bus users to 18% , there was not much of a difference as compared to the beginning of 1980 which was 20%. Finally, we witnessed the further fall to 10% on people walking to work and coming back home thus showing our dependency on vehicles.
In a nutshell, on one hand, the percentage of people using cars showed remarkable rise, on the other hand, the amount of people walking or using bikes fell rapidly over the 40 years. Bus was the only form of transport that showed very little change.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation about four types of transportation bus, car, bike, foot used for commuting ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd was the least famous amongst all. However in the year 1980, people preferred to t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d and reached a peak of 38%. In contrast , the percentage of bikes reached a troug...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a drop in percentage of bus users to 18% , there was not much of a difference as c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, thus, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74909090909 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56638838827 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 106.607317073 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8244631082 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251490722553 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814389236587 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833390554683 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142163926438 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623805565001 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.