The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The giver column charts compare the total number of marriages and divorces along with the proportion of the marital status who were adult in America from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, it can be deemed that the rate of marriages increased highly rather than divorce in 4 several and the percentage of married America raise in 1970 and 2000.
First of all, the base of marriages climbed up surprisingly by almost 2.5 million in 1970 which was similar in 1980. Moreover, the column decreased slightly by approximately 2.3 million in 1990 while it fell down gradually to 2 million in 2000. However, the total number of divorces was more than 1 million in 1970 and 2000 when it climbed up rapidly by just under the 1.5 million in 1980 which dropped again in 1990 by just over the I million in the USA.
In the second graph, the portion raise slowly by almost and 20% in 1970 and 2000 respectively. Therefore, the percentage of married people raise by 10% in 1970 and just under the 60% in 2000. At last not the least, the portion of widowed and divorced were no more than 10% in two different years in the USA.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (America) must be used with a third-person verb: 'raises'.
Suggestion: raises
...l and the percentage of married America raise in 1970 and 2000. First of all, the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces was more than 1 million in 1970 and 2000 when it climbed up rapidly by just ...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'I'?
Suggestion: the; I
...hich dropped again in 1990 by just over the I million in the USA. In the second gr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ropped again in 1990 by just over the I million in the USA. In the second graph, the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, therefore, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.555 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39369484271 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1698506678 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264596728303 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115173238083 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699629112723 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172407946478 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633990839765 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.