The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisos where relevant.

The pie and bar graph illustrate the information about usage of water in different countries and all around the world in 2000 respectively.

At a glance, it is observed that striking factor being the trend of variation in usage of water in all around the world. However, 70 percent water was used for agricultural sector. 22 percent water was used by industrial sector. Industrial sector used almost three times more than domestic sector. The bar graph shows water used by different countries in 2000. Moreover, 69 percent water was used by China for agricultural sector as well as it was three times more than industrial sector. 3 percent water was used by India for industrial sector. Industrial sector closely followed the domestic sector. Besides this, 46 percent water was used by New Zealand for domestic sector. There was bleak difference between usage of water for agricultural and domestic sector. Whereas, 80 percent water was used by Canada for industrial sector and it was ten times more than agricultural sector.

In the nutshell, in the world more water used for agricultural sector. In Canada 8 percent water used for agricultural purpose. India used more water for for agricultural sector.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...cultural purpose. India used more water for for agricultural sector.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13131313131 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69933313005 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.388888888889 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0831440437 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.7333333333 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156010339732 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899969008064 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480618484215 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133681952765 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389083024123 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.59 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.