The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate information about age groups of population in Yemen and Italy in 2000 and predictions in 2050. Further projections for 2050 obviously shows that there will be decrease in the amount of young generation while middle aged and older population is growing in both countries.

Half of the pie chart is allotted to 0-14 years children in Yemen in 2000, but this figure will be dropped to 37 % by 2050. Despite this, population with 15-59 years old has got 46.3% share in 2000 in Yemen which will be swelled to 57.3% in 2050. However, people with the age group of 60 years and older makes up an insignificant part at 3.6% in 2000 and there will be slight increase to about 5.7% in 2050 in Yemen.

The vast majority of the population in Italy is 15-59 years old people at 61.6% in 2000 and this figure will shrink to 46.2% in 2050. Older aged group of people has got 24.1% of population in 2000 and this amount will be gradually climbed to 42.3% in 2050. Younger generation holds a rather miniscule share of population in Italy just about 14.3% which is going to slid to 11.5% in 2050.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2000 and there will be slight increase to about 5.7% in 2050 in Yemen. The v...
^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'slide'
Suggestion: slide
...taly just about 14.3% which is going to slid to 11.5% in 2050.
^^^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich is going to slid to 11.5% in 2050.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52736318408 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37155065817 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497512437811 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0145039199 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259081246989 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14149628296 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804120382812 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209304121754 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716351913251 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.