The charts below show the percentage of the water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrates the information about water usages for 3 different purposes in six areas of the world. It is noteworthy that a vast majority of the water has been used in agricultural sectors all over the world.
The water usage for industrial purposes in North America holds almost half share of the pie chart at 48% while the rest half of pie chart has been divided between domestic use and agricultural use at 13% and 39% respectively. However, in South America industrial usage of water holds a rather miniscule share at 10%. The majority water usage is allotted to agricultural field at 71% and just 19% of water is used in houses. We can see similar figures to North America in Europe. Industrial use holds a slight majority of water usage at 53% while agricultural and domestic usages are at 32% and 15% respectively.
In Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia, the water usages in different sectors show similar amounts. In each country agricultural usage of water holds a majority share at 84%, 88% and 81% in Africa, Central and South East Asia respectively. Conversely, only a negligible part of water use is given to domestic usage at 9% in Africa and 7% in both Central and South East Asia. Likewise, Industrial use of water also holds small share at 7% in Africa, 5% in Central Asia and 12% in South East Asia.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70464135021 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65529943848 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430379746835 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9636198197 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.363636364 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170309148009 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907150276586 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906770250989 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16737798714 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109202660992 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.