The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate the information about energy consumption in Australian households and greenhouse gas emission which is caused by energy use. The pie charts is partitioned into 6 sections in order to show 6 different sectors of energy use and their contribution of each of these sectors to greenhouse effects.
From the first pie chart, it is obvious that the vast majority of energy is consumed for heating at about 42%. While energy use for water heating is 30%, only 28% of the pie is allotted to energy consumption of refrigeration, cooling, lighting, and other appliances at 7%, 2%, 4% and 15% respectively.
While talking about greenhouse gas emissions in Australian households, we can say that heating and refrigeration contain items of approximately equal size at 15% and 14% respectively. Despite this, water heating has a slight majority in greenhouse effects at 32%. Similarly, gas emissions for other appliances is just near to water heating at about 28%. Contribution of lighting to greenhouse effects is 8% while cooling makes up an insignificant part at about 2%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19101123596 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1182356407 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7645679482 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288765006829 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137861339481 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107725592917 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214378859472 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119358060302 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.