The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare different population age groups of Yemen and Itlay in 2000, including estimations for 2050.
In 2000, 0-14-years old children made up about a half of Yemen’s total population while they represented for only 14.3% in Italy whose majority of population was distributed by people at the ages of 15-59 (61.6%). Interestingly, elderly people of above 60 accounted for nearly a quarter of population of Italy whereas this group was the lowest among the population age groups of Yemen with a mere 3.6%.
It is anticipated that the working age group (15-59 years) will rise to 57.3% of Yemen’s population in 2050, followed by children and elderly groups with 37% and 5.7% respectively. Meanwhile in Italy, the percentage of elderly people is expected to increase to 42.3% and that of working people will fall down to 46.2% in 2050, making the gap between them smaller.
Overall, most of the population of both countries will be represented by 15-59-years old people in 2050, and the difference between their proportions of the elderly will become wider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... groups with 37% and 5.7% respectively. Meanwhile in Italy, the percentage of elderly peo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10734463277 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86557103118 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.8364863253 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197378858252 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116839629101 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672096061454 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13881434768 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756685425311 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.