The pie charts explains the agewise distribution of population in two countries Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and expectations of the year 2050.
Overall in Yemen, younger children and adults upto the age of 60 were in higher proportions with elderly individuals in negligible numbers. But in Italy, old aged populations and people between 15 to 60 were in accountable portions and children upto the age of 14 was in lesser percentages.
Moving on to the details of Yemen, half of the populations of 2000 was filled up by children upto the age of 14 where as it reduced to just a quarter by 2050. At the same time people between age 15 and 60 years was 46.3 % in 2000 and supposed to go up to 57.3 % by 2050. In both these years elderly persona with age 60 and above remained negligible, 3.6 % and 5.7 % respectively.
Next looking into informations of Italy, in both 2000 and 2050, incontrast to Yemen elderly people were in significant proportions which comes to be 24.1% and 42.3%.In this population younger childrens between age 0 to 14 years were 14.3 % and 11.5 % in 2000 and 2050,which were in small proportions with respect to Yemen. Age varying from 15 to 59 yaers marked the largest proportions and it was 61.6 % and 46.2 % seperately and was almost comparable to Yemen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...illed up by children upto the age of 14 where as it reduced to just a quarter by 2050. A...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...tions which comes to be 24.1% and 42.3%.In this population younger childrens betwe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71111111111 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79963894594 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502222222222 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7778125605 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200472585497 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097584930499 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542783603109 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137747756191 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348098972186 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.