The chart explains three different categories of telephoning techniques used in United KIngdome during the period 1995 to 2002. The total minutes are shown in billions.
Overall, among the types of calls made in UK, fixed line local calls remained the highest through out the year. Following this comes fixed line national and international and lastly all mobile calls.
Moving on to the details, In the year 1995, 72 billion minutes of call was made as local calls inside the country from fixed lines. At the same time ,calls going to national and international levels from fixed lines were only half of the earliest accounting to 37 billion minutes approximately. Where as, all types of mobile calls comes nearly 3 billion minutes.
Local call usage increased gradually in the following years and marked the highest of the period in 1999, about 90 billion minutes even if in 1998 it was just under 90 billion. And from 1999 to 2002, it decreased to 72 billion minutes similiar to the initial level. Eventhough, overall usage was lesser for both fixed line national and international minutes and mobile minutes, these two categories showed increasing trend till the end. In the year 2002, these total minutes were coming to 60 billion and 45 billion respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...d line local calls remained the highest through out the year. Following this comes fixed li...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...untry from fixed lines. At the same time ,calls going to national and internationa...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd international levels from fixed lines were only half of the earliest accountin...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...ng to 37 billion minutes approximately. Where as, all types of mobile calls comes nearly...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'calls'' or 'call's'?
Suggestion: calls'; call's
...ximately. Where as, all types of mobile calls comes nearly 3 billion minutes. Loca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03791469194 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54432196632 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0190826385 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6363636364 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309976175237 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127402432286 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634298691623 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189128238766 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703724040439 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.