the charts below illustrate which is of 3 fast food restaurants are the most preferred amongs teenagers in Vietnam and Indonesia in 2017 and prediction for 2027.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where elevant.
The pie charts show information about three categories of fast food restaurants for Vietnam and Indonesia between 2017 and 2027.
Overall, it is clear that Mc Donald’s was higher fast food restaurants in Indonesia than Burger King in Vietnam. While Both of Vietnam and Indonesia are the highest for McDonald’s and another are the lowest during the period.
According to the data, in 2017, the most popular fast food restaurants was Burger King at about 53% and McDonald's was at around 61% for Vietnam and Indonesia. By contrast, there are a decrease considerably fast food like KFC at nearly 4.1% and 15.4% respectively for two countries.
In 2027, the figures show that Mc Donald’s are the highest fast food restaurants for Vietnam and Indonesia, at 58% and 49% respectively. Meanwhile, the latter in Indonesia in 2027, will predicted higher fast food restaurants by 49% than that of 6,3 % in Vietnam. Then, the amounts of people who often eating fast food will expect Burger Kings restaurants increase dramatically at 39% in Vietnam and at 12.3% in Indonesia over the period 2027.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trast, there are a decrease considerably fast food like KFC at nearly 4.1% and 15...
^^
Line 13, column 192, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'predict'
Suggestion: predict
..., the latter in Indonesia in 2027, will predicted higher fast food restaurants by 49% tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Indonesia over the period 2027.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26111111111 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92120508527 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7183493551 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326691673888 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181613822563 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783280637859 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238307459787 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680472903385 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.