the charts below illustrate which of 3 fast ood restaurants are the most preferred amongst teenagers in Viatnam and In Indonesia in 2017 and predictions for 2027
3 fast food outlet’s brands which most visited between teenagers in Indonesia and in Vietnam in 2017 and the forecastings in following 10 years can be seen in pie charts and this is measured in percentages.
In 2017, more than a half Vietnamese youngsters preferred to eat fast food in Burger King while this percentage presented a very minority of those from Indonesia. McDonald’s ranked second having lower 9.7% than the aforementioned figure. But this outlet had the highest number of others, 60.8%, in Indonesia. While obtained 4.1% in Vietnam, KFC had 23.8% In Indonesia.
By 2017, the number of youngsters buying fast food in Burger King would be projected to decrease in those nations by 14% and 2% respectively. An upward trend would be predicted for McDonald’s young customer proportions in Vietnam by less than a fifth but trend would be reversed in Indonesia to 48.5%. The quantity of young consumers would experience a rise for KFC not only in Vietnam but in Indonesia by 2.2% and 15.4% subsequently.
Overall, majority of teenagers in Vietnam tend to purchase fast food in Burger King while those in Indonesia choose McDonald’s. Then, the number of young customers would be forecasted to climb for McDonald’s and KFC, but Burger King would witness the opposite trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
3 fast food outlet's brands which mos...
^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...referred to eat fast food in Burger King while this percentage presented a very m...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... obtained 4.1% in Vietnam, KFC had 23.8% In Indonesia. By 2017, the number o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21596244131 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10539869727 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1291480088 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180994320538 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764122146545 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544811973579 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125997068493 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483426885846 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.