The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Three above pie charts demonstrate the normal proportion of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in common mealtimes which could be harmful if they have used a lot.
Overall, it is clear that although the greatest category which sodium and fat were used was about dinner, sugar was added in snacks the most.
In the first Figure, sodium was indicated to be used 43% in night meals which was the high proportion of usage throughout all three charts. The other high percentage was allocated to lunch which was consumed 29% of sodium. In the final groups, snack and breakfast, similar percent of 14 were used.
As like sodium, saturated fat seemed to be utilized more than any meals in dinnertimes with 37. With little alterations such as a slight increase in snack ingredient to 21% and also a decline to 16% for breakfast. In final figure, as it was mentioned before, a high usage unlike the other two charts, 42% of sugar was devoted to snacks. While, only 23 percent was consumed for dinner meals. The rest of the sugar was approximately divided in half between the two other groups with 4 percent difference.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75773195876 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48023861557 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582474226804 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5190713275 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100903572394 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428513364701 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520332907283 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729858711589 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467936320663 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.