The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same periods.
The table gives information about the numbers of visitors in the specific era to Ashdown museum the year before and after it was repaired. Two pie graphs above demonstrate the satisfaction rate of individuals’ journey through their visit to Ashdown museum in the mentioned era which was collected from the results of one questionnaire.
Overall, it is completely obvious that the number of visitors rose after the place was refurbished. Also, it is true that although high proportion of visitors were unhappy with the place before the refurbishment, after that the amount of people who were satisfied of this museum increased noticeably.
According to the table, the museum gained more visitors during this change from 74000 to 92000.
In figure one, year before refurbishment, the 40 proportion of people were unsatisfied which was the highest amount of visitors. 30% were satisfied with the place and only 15% allocated to group of individuals who were very satisfied.
In figure two, proportion of satisfied people rose gradually to 40% and visitors who claimed that they were very satisfied with the whole refurbishment had a sharply increase with almost 20 percent to 35 proportion of people. Finally, the amount of unhappy people dramatically declined to 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...isfied with the whole refurbishment had a sharply increase with almost 20 percent to 35 proportion...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27586206897 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91385035901 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.275150483 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345346274289 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139259017763 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772546980693 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180776043913 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055138026869 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.