the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts demonstrate the percentage of nutritious in three categories: sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in USA.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that most significant difference for use in meal were in the sodium and added sugar.
Firstly, while snacks used the maximal percentage (42%) of added sugar, used sodium had the least percentage (14%). In addition, while dinner had a biggest percentage of using sodium (43%), however, he had almost the lowest percentage (23%) in the adding of sugar. These highest percentages occupy more than half of the given graphs.
Secondly, there were also not considerable distinctions in breakfast and lunch. In the three categories of nutrients they had similar differences. For example, the breakfast consumed approximately 16% for all categories, moreover, the provided types of nutritives were used for lunch only about 25% .
All in all, as it provided, dinner and lunch used the considerable percentage of minerals, which were more unhealthier than other groups of meal in USA.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...tage 14%. In addition, while dinner had a biggest percentage of using sodium 43%,...
^
Line 6, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tives were used for lunch only about 25% . All in all, as it provided, dinner ...
^^
Line 8, column 103, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'unhealthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: unhealthier
...able percentage of minerals, which were more unhealthier than other groups of meal in USA.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30909090909 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87969450485 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8464440829 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114455321393 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511139852866 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374310306866 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734250157886 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364453817429 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.