The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts describes clearly percentages of typical meals of three types of nutrients, consumed in the America.

In breakfast time-consuming saturated fat and added sugar is almost same 16%, but taking sodium is bit lower percentage(14%). All these items consuming in lunch, sodium and saturated fat is almost same, (29% to 26%) added sugar value is only 19%. In the mean time-consuming snacks percentage sugar added snacks is 42%. saturated fat is 21 percentage sodium content snack percentage is 14%.

On dinner time, consuming all these three nutrients vary in order to consuming sodium 43 percentage, saturated fat is 37 percentage added sugar meal is 23 percentage.

Finally, in USA consuming sodium, saturated fat, added sugar consuming in typical meals is very high percentage in dinner meals. Moderate percentage in lunch less percentage in breakfast.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...s almost same 16%, but taking sodium is bit lower percentage14%. All these items co...
^^^
Line 4, column 316, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Saturated
...s percentage sugar added snacks is 42%. saturated fat is 21 percentage sodium content sna...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43382352941 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96131889571 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3199559295 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114426609305 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729444049613 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686644436833 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113784440802 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758686946202 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.