The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The charts below depict the proportion of three types of nutrients in Americans' main meals, which may be harmful if consumed excessively. In general, it can be seen that Sodium and Saturated fat are mostly consumed in Dinner, while Added sugar is mainly ingested in Snacks.

Looking at the charts in more detail, both Sodium and Saturated fat are mostly eaten in Dinner, at 43% and 37%, respectively. Following Dinner, Sodium and Saturated fat are consumed in Lunch, which account for 29% and 26%, respectively. After Dinner, Sodium has tied percentage (14%) in both Breakfast and Snacks, while Saturated fat accounts for 21% in Snacks. and contributes 16% in Breakfast.

Meanwhile, Added sugar is mainly consumed in Snacks, which contributes 42%. Next, Added sugar is contained in Dinner, with proportion of more than a half of Snacks' Added sugar, at 23%. After that, Lunch becomes the third meal type which contains the most Added sugar, at 19%. Lastly, Added sugar is least consumed in Breakfast, which accounts for 16%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...turated fat accounts for 21% in Snacks. and contributes 16% in Breakfast. Meanw...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, look, may, so, third, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08284023669 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58098071156 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1384007296 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123106166895 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607504116727 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761918461093 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104042225486 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734823003687 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.