The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The given three pie charts depicts the average proportions of sodium, saturated fat, and the added sugar in everyday meals which each of those nutrients might be unhealthy if used excessively. Overall, it can be seen that Americans consume both sodium and saturated fat the most in dinner while they eat more snacks that contain the highest level of sugar.

To begin with, people in USA have most sodium in dinner at 43%, followed by, 29% of it is in lunch. Breakfast and snacks have the same percentage of sodium in at 14%. Likewise, Americans eat the most food which contains 37% of saturated fat in dinner whereas the less consumption of saturated far is in the breakfast at 16%. Lunch and snacks that are eaten by individuals there contain approximately similar percentage of saturated fat at 26% and 21%, respectively.

In contrast, 42% of the added sugar in USA is most consumed in snacks. Dinner comes second where American people eat added sugar at 33%. Finally, 16% and 19% of the sugar is exist in USA lunch and breakfast meals.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...%. Finally, 16% and 19% of the sugar is exist in USA lunch and breakfast meals.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, likewise, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77348066298 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55733676065 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3316013532 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118259935023 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533920751595 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529740638565 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811338781717 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397470089481 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.