The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.

The charts compare the proportion of three unhealthy nutrients provided being overtaken, namely sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in four typical meals including breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in USA.

As shown in the first two charts, sodium and saturated fat are dominant in dinner, reaching at 43% and 37% respectively. More than one quarter of these two nutrients can be found in lunch, accounting for 29% and 26%. In addition, the sodium accounts for the same ratio of 14% in breakfast and snacks each, while saturated fat takes 16% in breakfast and 21% in snacks.

On the other hand, added sugar shows a different pattern in the third chart, which accounts the most percentage at 42% in snacks, followed by dinner at 23%. It stands for less than 20% in lunch and breakfast.

Based on the information above, breakfast is the healthiest meal while dinner and snacks contain the most unhealth ingredients.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03246753247 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60179012547 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1231713868 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960377176202 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432288919342 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479653900082 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693301668889 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431071029778 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.