The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
Three pie charts depict how much in percentages different types of nutrients contributed to the popular American meals.
Added sodium, saturated fats, and sugars may be harmful to human health if they are consumed too much.
Overall, dinner contained most of the unhealthy elements, in comparison breakfast was the healthiest from the presented meals.
Added sodium was consumed by Americans in 43% during dinner, and lunch was the second meal which provided most of the sodium accounted for 25%.
Around a quarter of daily sodium income was provided in breakfast and snacks.
As well as with sodium, the dinner was the meal which comprised of the highest amount of saturated fats and they were at the level of 37% of daily consumption.
In comparison to sodium content, the snacks and breakfast seemed to be more unhealthy if it comes to fatty acids, because they provided 21% and 16% of daily saturated fat intake, respectively. Similarly to sodium, lunch provided 26% of fats.
The most significant provider of added sugars in the American diet were snacks with 42% content. In opposite to sodium and saturated fats, sugars in dinner made up 23 % of the daily income of this unhealthy nutrient. The percentage of added carbohydrates in breakfast was 16% and it was the same as the additional fatty acids content in this meal. Lunch seemed to be the healthiest meal if it comes to added sugars and provided 19% of their daily income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 49, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
...as with sodium, the dinner was the meal which comprised of the highest amount of saturated fats an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ily saturated fat intake, respectively. Similarly to sodium, lunch provided 26% of fats. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, similarly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34599156118 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34931671585 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.7594816307 43.030603864 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.777777778 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 3.83414634146 209% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104080394381 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456226823779 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424209663297 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576155564717 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345520584007 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.