The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

Essay topics:

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two line graphs illustrate the percentage of electrical appliances with washing machines, refrigerators, and vacuum cleaners in households and the number of hours per week spent on household chores from 1920 to 2019.

Overall, a long period revealed that the more electrical equipment was applianced, the less time for people to do chores every week. Besides, the frequency of refrigerator spending witnessed an outstanding growth in 99 years, which exceeded other equipment.

With regard to the proportion of electrical appliances in households, all of them significantly increased over nearly a century. It is undeniable that there was the most considerable change in refrigerator spending from a small fraction in 1920 to 100% in 1980 and the trend stayed stable till 2019. Meanwhile, although the highest percentage of electrical expenditure in 1920 belonged to washing machines, it experienced a gradual climb and stopped at more than 70% in 2019.

In contrast, the amount of time spent on housework such as: washing clothes, preparing meals and cleaning per week tended to sharply decrease in the first 20 years and went down slowly till 2019. In 1920, when electricity was not popular with families, the number of hours of housework per week stood at 50%. In 2019, however, the figures declined by 40% due to the electrical appliances.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...920 to 100% in 1980 and the trend stayed stable till 2019. Meanwhile, although th...
^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...urs of housework per week stood at 50%. In 2019, however, the figures declined by ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, while, in contrast, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28703703704 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96221055262 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0822240411 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204482218521 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793147007274 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395763493003 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121318204775 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402903086951 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.