The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the internet was accessed.
The left bar chart depicts the proportion of people in two age groups 25-44 and 65+ bought concert, cinema, and theater tickets online while the right one shows how the desktop computer, laptop and mobile phone were accessed to purchased tickets. The data were collected in three countries, Australia, the UK, and Malaysia, over the first three months of 2006. The unit was used in both two charts is the percentage (%).
It can be seen from the first chart that, in both Australia and the UK, there were more young people than old people bought the tickets on the Internet. To be more precise, the percentage of people aged between 25 and 44 in these two countries who bought the tickets online was significant high with just over half, while that of aged 65 and over witnessed approximately 45%. On the other side, in an Asia country, Malaysia, a different picture can be seen with the higher proportion for the age of 65 and over, although there was a tiny difference by only 2%.
In the way of purchase the tickets, desktop computer mainly was accessed by people in both three countries with around 60%, followed by the laptop with 30% of England, and 40% of people in Australia and Malaysia used it to book the tickets. With no more than 30% of users, mobile phone was the less common tool that people used to buy the tickets on the Internet.
In conclusion, the most significant amount of people, who bought online tickets relates to the continent. Interestingly, the highest usage of tools to buy the tickets was in Malaysia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a, over the first three months of 2006. The unit was used in both two charts is the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45442659495 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6402351481 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.9 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301595262665 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116230319328 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664489139514 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180941969039 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10962875099 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.