The two given graphs demonstrate why people study and the supports they receive from employers in term of time and financial. All data are shown in percentages and the target group are students under 26 to over 49.
The first paragraph indicates the purpose students study. When people grow older, the motivation of pursuing knowledge for working decreases where the incentive for enjoyment goes up, as the index applies for people under 40 and over 49. Interestingly, those in their forties revealed that both reasons they study are equal, of 40%.
As we can see in the second paragraph, the supports each generation received varies differently. Students under 26 gain the highest proportion of over 60%. This is followed by age group of 26-29 with 50% of aid. People between 30-39 receive the least help with the proportion of about 30% - approximately 2 times lower higher than those first group age get. The last two generations’ percentages of employer supports srise indicrementally, in which the data are sequently 35% and 40%.
From these perspectives, the older people are, the more interested they are in study. Obviously, people under thirties receive much supports than any other group age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st help with the proportion of about 30% - approximately 2 times lower higher tha...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...bviously, people under thirties receive much supports than any other group age.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82801676238 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619289340102 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9673279171 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157056799715 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058192079788 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280427756231 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103249722834 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168969502909 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.