The given pie charts display the employment distribution in terms of three different sectors in towns A, and B in two years (1960, and 2010).
Overall, both two towns experienced a significant employment formation, with an increase in the services sector, and a decrease in the manufacturing field. Notably, the services and manufacturing sectors attracted the majority of working people in towns A, and B respectively.
Upon analyzing the data for greater detail, in 1960, the majority of workforce in town B worked in the manufacturing sector, with 70%, which was significantly higher than those in town A (41%). Following, the sales-related employment accounted for about 30% of labor workforce in town A, compared to a fifth of those in town B. The services field employed the lowest percentage of working people in both towns, with only 29% those in town A and 10% those in town B.
By 2010, the services emerged as the primary employment sector in town A, with a peak of 64%, in comparison with a dramatic increase that in town B, with about 25%. The manufacturing still employed the highest proportion of town B’s employees, despite a significant drop to 53%. Meanwhile, town A also experienced a considerable decrease of a half (20%) in this sector. Those having sales-related jobs in town A decline two-fold to 16%, whereas a small rise to 22% was seen in those in town B.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...ment formation, with an increase in the services sector, and a decrease in the manufactu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88510638298 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05397350798 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485106382979 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1228685799 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420131304763 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192737989161 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749837827849 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284633864667 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414187183614 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.