The provided pie chart indicates the data regarding ratio of food spending on restaurant meals and home cooking, whereas the graph illustrates the number of eaten foods at fast food and sit-down restaurants per year in 3 decades.
It is obvious from pie charts, that percentage of expenses on foods at restaurants increased from one-tenth in 1970 to fifty percent in 2000. Throughout the time frame between 1970 and 2000, the number experienced only steady increase, as charts show percentage of fifteen for 1980's and just over one-third in 1990's statistics. The same proportion of expenditure on restaurant and home cooking meals was seen in 2000's.
As for graph, in inception both fast food and sit-down restaurants' meals were in the same amounts, which was 20 per year. However, as the both trend were upward, in 2000's sit-down restaurants reached the bullet point of 50 per year. In contrast, the number of consumed fast-food restaurants' meals rocketed 90 per year in the same year.
Overall, obviously, the trend of eating at restaurants rose dramatically according to the historical data. Clearly, spending on home cooking faced decrease in the given years.
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 44
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organisations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent.What are your views? 84
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the government of richer nation should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such area. 61
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work https ielts simon com a 6a0120a5bb05d8970c01b8d0f4cae8970c 500wi 72
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...fteen for 1980s and just over one-third in 1990s statistics. The same proportion of expe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...taurant and home cooking meals was seen in 2000s. As for graph, in inception both fas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...However, as the both trend were upward, in 2000s sit-down restaurants reached the bullet...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, whereas, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17368421053 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76698481856 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568421052632 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3708771293 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365993566026 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147482980278 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975677298137 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21736309873 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103645574903 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.