The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world .

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features ,and make comparisons where relevant .

The Picture illustrates the proportion of water utilization for a variety of purposes such as industrial, agricultural and domestic usage in six regions of the world including North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia.

Overall, Europe leads other regions in Industrial water usage and the Central Asian region uses the most water for agricultural purposes. In contrast, Central Asia has the least proportion of water utilization in industries. South America tops the table for its highest usage of water for domestic purposes.

Regions like Central Asia, Southeast Asia, Africa, South America has the highest as well as similar proportion in terms of agricultural usage of water and it is about 88%, 81%, 84%, and 71% respectively. With the least amount of water used in industries and domestic purpose, with these two sources combined it is almost or lesser than a fifth of total water usage in the above-mentioned regions.

In comparison, North America and Europe have similar water usage, in case of industries with 53% water used by Europe and 48% water used by North America, therefore, this is the highest water utilizing zone in these two regions. Agriculture uses one third with domestic being the least of almost one fifth.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rica, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia. Overall, Europe leads other regions in I...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, third, well, in contrast, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24390243902 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73812834202 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473170731707 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5676347785 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.375 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143635046544 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744472792652 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372513416478 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103621893884 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257505129394 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.