The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams above representate the various functions of water in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia. It were measured in percentage. Overall, in can be seen in six countries that the dominance water use reached by agricultural except in Europe while the minimum use of water possessed by industrial and domestic use depend on the countries.
According to the data, more than three quarter of using water dominated by agricultural in Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia, consecutively 84%, 88%, and 81% while industrial use stood at 7%, 5%, and 12% then domestic use had the same amount around 7-9%. In short, the highly water use achieved by Central Asia in agricultural subject among these countries.
Then in North America, South America, and Europe, water use in South America’s agricultural had the most number between another subjects in these countries, it was 71% whilst in North America and Europe exactly 39% and 32%. However, 10% located at South America’s industrial use, which was the lower amount of using water beside in other country, it was the upper number, North America and Europe obtained the percentage surely 48% and 53%. Following that, domestic use gained the similar percentage approximately 13-19%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... industrial use stood at 7%, 5%, and 12% then domestic use had the same amount ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, while, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23786407767 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6804074026 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6485485838 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117100656061 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060906920469 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392863248328 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919867398155 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121437214706 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.