The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The charts shown, illustrate the proportion of water consumed by 6 regions(North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia and South-East Asia) of the world, for three different purposes(industrial use, agricultural use, domestic use).

Overall, we can observe that the maximum water usage for North America and Europe is in the sector of Industrail use. On the contrary, the maximum water consumption for South America, Africa, Central Asia and South-East Asia is for agricultural purposes.

Europe consumes the greatest fraction of water, 53% among the 6 regions for industrial use. This is followed closely by North America, which used 48% of it's water for the purpose of industrial use. Europe and North America also have similar percentages for water consumption regarding agriculture and domestic use.

Central Asia, leads the way for regions of the world that use most of their water for agricultural purposes, around 88% of their total water consumption. Africa comes close to Central Asia with a fraction of .84, followed by South East Asia with a score of 81% and lastly South Ameirca 71% of their water for agricultulral purposes. All these 4 regions, have a similar proportion for water consumption regarding industrial use and domestic use, apart from South America that deviates from this pattern with a 19% water usage for domestic purposes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'America' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
...ion of water consumed by 6 regionsNorth America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, regarding, so, apart from, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32718894009 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85192030491 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47465437788 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6478908479 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.444444444 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198516768196 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115330065629 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383517810131 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150245413222 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298664962783 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.