The pie charts illustrated the proportion of water utilization for three main purposes like agriculture, industrial and domestic use in six regions of the world. It is apparent from the data supplied that most of these areas use a considerable amount of water in agriculture usage, comes in second place is industrial use and the least amount of water is used for domestic purpose.
It is obvious that, according to the pie chart, North America and Europe are likely the same regarding the amount of water consumption for all three purposes. In both continents, the amount of water using for industrial use is accounted for nearly half of the total amount, 48% and 53% respectively. For raising crops, both continents use one-third of the overall amount of water consumption while the local people just use 13% and 15% of water individually.
However, regarding four others regions, agriculture is quite important, that is the reason why their water consumption in crop-feeding contributed to the highest percentage, it reduces slightly from Central Asia (88%) to Africa (84%), South East Asia comes after with 81% and South America has the least amount of 71%. On the contrary, the percentage of water utilization for developing industrial zone is quite low, it just attributes from 7% to 12%. Additionally, the water use for people's families in Central Asia, South East Asia, Africa just about one-tenth of the overall amount while South America consume 19%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, second, so, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12133891213 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80551967286 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523012552301 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8221226307 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209283518219 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114825984527 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655915280542 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162104069125 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728190218249 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.