The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Given are two pie charts delineating the sum consumed of citizens in a specific European country in terms of rate spent on distinct commodities in a 50-year period commencing from 1958 to 2008.
It is perceptible that the percentages of people who lived in that European country using houses, luxury items and tourism leaped over the year while the opposite is true for those residents in terms of proportions.
When it comes to the rates of people who possessed real estates and luxury items, a remarkable surge, are registered from 22% to 32% for the former and 7% to 17% for the latter. Not surprisingly, the rates of people who travel swelled in a vicinity of 9% owing to the development of transportations and services.
Regarding the percentages of citizens who demanded food in that European country diminished astonishingly from the first rank to almost bottom compared to others in the pie charts. Lastly, the proportions of residents who lived in the Euro ranked bottom with a 7% moderation, followed by a 2 % plummet of sales in Euro for clothing in terms of rate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are two pie charts delineating the sum cons...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, regarding, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85869565217 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91649549047 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.6131175505 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 149.0 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12065131906 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608591021827 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524824049006 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080212512593 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547736005417 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.