The graphs compare the quantity of individuals’ total expenditure in a certain European country on various commodities and services in 1958 and 2008.
Overall, there was an increase in the percentage of expense spent on housing, food and luxury goods. By contrast, the figures for clothing, entertainment, and travel declined; specially, the amount of resource consumed for clothing experienced the most noticeable fall.
In 1958, the rate of clothing was highest, at 32%, while the figure for housing was slightly lower, at 22%. Meanwhile, the percentages of spending spent on food and entertainment were 8% and 18% respectively; while 13% of cost paid for transport, compared to only 7% of the proportion of spending used for luxury goods.
In 2008, the share of housing’s expense considerably increased to 32% and became the highest figure in the chart. Similar changes, but with slighter extent, can be seen in the figure for food and luxury goods, which went up by around 10% to 17% . Whereas, the percentages of resource expended on entertainment and travel dropped to 16% and 6% respectively, while the figure for clothing experienced a remarkable fall to 12%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...odities and services in 1958 and 2008. Overall, there was an increase in the pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experienced the most noticeable fall. In 1958, the rate of clothing was highes...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of spending used for luxury goods. In 2008, the share of housing’s expense ...
^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oods, which went up by around 10% to 17% . Whereas, the percentages of resource ex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21164021164 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05611869793 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597883597884 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1988863779 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173108516471 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814953355291 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091381745165 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128183992606 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104611764153 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.