The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of people's sum expenditure on six goods and services, namely Housing, Food, Clothing, Travel/transport, Entertainment, Luxury goods in a European country between 1958 and 2008.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the amount of money spending in all aspects, except clothing, changing quite substantially over the fifty years period.
In 1958, the resident spent the largest portion of their coins for food at 32%, followed by Clothing and Entertainment at 18% and 13%, respectively. Over the five decades ensuing, there has been a significant change in the way people to spend. The quantity of cash using for food decreased violently to 12%. Besides, Entertainment services also saw a double down to 6%, while this figure for Clothing just experienced a slight decrease of 2%.
Regarding the remaining three items, the sum of money was used to pay for housing stood second place with at 22%, approximately three times higher than that of Travel/transport and Luxury goods with numbers as 8% and 7%, respectively. 50 years later, each person had to pay added for housing 10%, the total of money paid for the other two categories increased to 17%, together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or food at 32%, followed by Clothing and Entertainment at 18% and 13%, respective...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01937423202 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686868686869 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.679459526 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.875 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130374815873 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508547506788 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482626772786 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752767489177 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547249379632 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.