The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
This table illustrates the comparison of two different years when british people speaking two differnt lanuages in addition to english.
The massive proporation of british students spoke spanish by 30% in 2000 and this figure was replaced by 35% a decade later. The smallest proporation recorded was 10% who spoke two other lanuages and 10% german only.
In 2010, percentage of people speaking no other lanuages was dropped by 10% from 20% in 2000. However, there number of people speaking another language (15%) and two other langaues(10%) increase rapidly by 5% respectively in the next 10 years. People speaking germany remained constant even in year 2010. There was considerable decrease in percentage of british students who were speaking french (15%) in 2000 to 10% in 2010. British people showed special preference towards speaking spanish in 2000 and 2010 also. That's why it accounted for, that this rate was maximum at 35% in 2000 and was further increase to 35% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...english. The massive proporation of british students spoke spanish by 30% in...
^^
Line 9, column 505, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...wards speaking spanish in 2000 and 2010 also. Thats why it accounted for, that this ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 511, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...speaking spanish in 2000 and 2010 also. Thats why it accounted for, that this rate wa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11801242236 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60040089142 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552795031056 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1739626412 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5555555556 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27780208816 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128713283492 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637813138136 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166694738151 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779034539397 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.