The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the information about the terms of percentage of British learners who able to spoken other languages rather than English which was in one decade at particular university in England from 2000 to 2010.
In overall, English students who able to speak Spanish only constituted a major at one university since the least amount of those learners who able to spoke German only as well as two other languages. However, a significant variations can be observed over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that Spanish language only most popular among British students who able to speak it at specific university in England during the periods which accounted at three in ten between 2000. After one decade it increases steadily and reached at more than a third. Similarly, between2010 ( 10% ), the percentage of English learners who not able to spoken other languages had experienced at two times less of the total percentage as compared with 2000 ( 20% ). In contrast, a growth of 5% can be noticed in the proportion of whose students who speak another languages at one university in England between 2000 ( 15% ) and 2010 ( 10% ).
The charts further prove that from 2000 to 2010 , the number of British learners who spoke German only remained relatively constant at one in ten in England. Interestingly, English students who speak French only experienced at lass than a fifth during the starting of the period where it dropped at 5% and reached at 10% in the end of the period at particular university in England. Lastly, the amount of students who spoken two other languages were found at 10% and 15% respectively from 2000 to 2010 at one university in England.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...terms of percentage of British learners who able to spoken other languages rather than E...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...2010. In overall, English students who able to speak Spanish only constituted a maj...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...ince the least amount of those learners who able to spoke German only as well as two oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'variation'?
Suggestion: variation
...other languages. However, a significant variations can be observed over the periods. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...nly most popular among British students who able to speak it at specific university in E...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore than a third. Similarly, between2010 10% , the percentage of English learners...
^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...han a third. Similarly, between2010 10% , the percentage of English learners who ...
^^
Line 9, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e total percentage as compared with 2000 20% . In contrast, a growth of 5% can be...
^^
Line 9, column 481, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...al percentage as compared with 2000 20% . In contrast, a growth of 5% can be noti...
^^
Line 9, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t one university in England between 2000 15% and 2010 10% . The charts fur...
^^
Line 9, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... university in England between 2000 15% and 2010 10% . The charts further ...
^^
Line 9, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y in England between 2000 15% and 2010 10% . The charts further prove that...
^^
Line 9, column 652, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...England between 2000 15% and 2010 10% . The charts further prove that from...
^^
Line 13, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rts further prove that from 2000 to 2010 , the number of British learners who spok...
^^
Line 13, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erienced at lass than a fifth during the starting of the period where it dropped ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, similarly, third, well, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95070422535 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73519443189 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433098591549 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1739068763 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.6 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431892982299 0.215688989381 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205061852924 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103336040139 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309220394661 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646572089314 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.