Some people believe that technology has made men more social and other think that it has made him less social. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Due to rapid advancements in technologies which provide comfortable and convenient life to humans with the click at button. However, a section of society deems that with the use of technologies people becomes huge social because they make a vast amount of new friends from social networking apps. Whilst, others opposite these notion as it’s responsible to make less social to masses the reason is that they are busy to operate these gadgets, less face to face interactions, weak relationships as well. Moreover, this easy will shed light on both views along with my perception.
The one school of thought believes that modern technologies play crucial role among human’s lives as people can not imagine their life without these latest gadgets specially nowadays. On the other hand, these tools are helpful for masses to make them social in the worldwide and the main factor is that technologies are introducing a majority of social networking applications which can connect people with overseas. In addition to this, lots of people make new friends on these apps and expand a couple of times on chatting, sharing pictures and etcetera with them. Even though, a masses who lives in foreign regions specially students who can keep in touch with their families, relatives, friends and many more due to these technologies. Furthermore, they can make a video Call to families members and it just looks happen that they both family are sitting together, chatting with each other’s in reality. Apart from chatting, Modern technologies assist humans to spread their views and express feelings with others to upload the status, stories as well. For example,Louisa Gujar, a famous you tube comedian of today’s related to India, makes their comedy videos and uploading these onto Instagram as well as YouTube become popular in world and get lots of name and fame, followers as well.
The another school of thought neglect this prospective and said that advancements among technologies not only make people less social but also weak their relationship. Moving further, a huge number of people is deeply involving to utilise these gadgets so they not provide proper time to their families, relatives, friends and others so that is why they dramatically going far away from each others which perilous for their relations. Beside that, a drastic increase of isolation escalating day by day among humans which are caused to effect their relation bonding. The another concerning area is that due to using technologies there are few face to face interactions because people expand social apps to express their feelings and emotions by sending messages, to make call, sometimes video calls as well which not full fill the palace of human presences as well as they not able to physically touch them so in this manners men become less social. For instance, a survey conducted by media reported that a vast number of offspring is not familiar with their parents as their progenitors not offer them majority of time which mandatory for family bonding that is why they operate these tools to decline their isolations and for this cause they less attached with their guardians.
In my notion, it is true that the development of technologies for the betterment of masses as these provide aid them in household chores and keep in touch with their love ones with the help of social networking applications which connect them their friends within seconds utilise of technologies is good for some extent. However, if a person misuse these apps and give priority to these rather than relations than it is detrimental for all of them. So in my view-point, the use of technologies makes people social but it’s responsible to less face to face interactions with humans which are essential for all.
In conclusion, although the latest version of technology helps people to become social but overload expand of these are harmful and affect humans relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this notion' or 'these notions'?
Suggestion: this notion; these notions
...etworking apps. Whilst, others opposite these notion as it's responsible to make less s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a mass', 'a masse' or simply 'masses'?
Suggestion: a mass; a masse; masses
...es and etcetera with them. Even though, a masses who lives in foreign regions specially ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1079, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Louisa
...the status, stories as well. For example,Louisa Gujar, a famous you tube comedian of to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1267, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun name seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of names'.
Suggestion: lots of names
...YouTube become popular in world and get lots of name and fame, followers as well. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...Moving further, a huge number of people is deeply involving to utilise these gadgets so they not pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 639, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun face seems to be countable; consider using: 'few faces'.
Suggestion: few faces
...hat due to using technologies there are few face to face interactions because people exp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 913, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...not able to physically touch them so in this manners men become less social. For ins...
^^^^
Line 13, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e help of social networking applications which connect them their friends within ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my view, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 70.0 24.0651302605 291% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 41.998997996 226% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3322.0 1615.20841683 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 646.0 315.596192385 205% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0414809386 4.20363070211 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70501257709 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 176.041082164 165% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450464396285 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1020.6 506.74238477 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.9268562499 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.1 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183093841347 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717839341288 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519306438069 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129597399311 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238441658643 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 78.4519038076 200% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.