The proportion of income adults, men , women, children, boys and girls spent on four common items in the uk in 1998.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about the terms of percentage of wealth which expand by adults, males, females children, boys and girls on 4 various common things ( food, electronic equipment, music and videos) in the British nation during 1998.
In overall, women and girls constituted a major for spent money on food as well as music since least amount of income was utilised on videos and electronic equipment by females and adults. However, a significant disparity can be noticed in all items over the period.
It can be seen from the information that in the UK food items became more popular among women for expanding wealth which accounted at less than a two fifth followed by adults at a quarter between 1998 in specific region. Similarly, proportion of males, girls children and boys which used money upon food were found at 14%, 11%, 10% and 9% respectively during 1998 in particular country. Furthermore, videos attained a minimum figure for expanding amount by women, adults and men noticed at 0.5%, 1% and 2%. Whilst, a negligible difference of 1% can be observed in boys and girls percentage at 18% as well as 17% in given year in the UK. In addition to this, 12% children interested to expand wealth on videos.
The chart further proves that the amount of income which spent on music by young ones, males and females remained relatively constant at 5% during 1998 in the given country. Even though, girls accounted at two fifth for using income on music whilst children and boys percentage was 39% and 38% from 1998. Moreover, only 1% females expand wealth on electronic equipment while the proportion of males spent money on particular item observed at double (10%) as compared with adults and girls (5%) during the period in the British country.Lastly,children (23%) experienced at 5% more rather than boys (18%) of the total percentage of income utilised on electronic equipment between 1998 in the Uk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...ren, boys and girls on 4 various common things food, electronic equipment, music and ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oys and girls on 4 various common things food, electronic equipment, music and vi...
^^
Line 13, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ven though, girls accounted at two fifth for using income on music whilst childre...
^^
Line 13, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Lastly
...uring the period in the British country.Lastly,children 23% experienced at 5% more rat...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 539, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , children
...the period in the British country.Lastly,children 23% experienced at 5% more rather than ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, similarly, well, while, in addition, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 965.302439024 167% => OK
No of words: 325.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96307692308 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76195625723 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470769230769 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.4394252049 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.636363636 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5454545455 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335872651668 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12793278063 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550321505064 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207213410018 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349076618064 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.