The graph below shows the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
The multiline graph illustrate the information about the number of things exported in the UK by using four various ways ( road,water, rail and pipeline) during 1974 and 2002.
In overall, road constituted a major way for transporting goods in 26 years time; where, sent by pipeline was least. Quantity was measured in millions tonnes.
With regards, road noticed a most popular way among UK for importing goods between 1974 to 2002. Moreover, it represented a flu actual trend and reached at peak with nearly 100 million tonnes in 2002. Likewise, at first pipeline used negligible for supplying goods in UK during 1974 after that it started slightly inclined and accounted at over 20 million tonnes Byron 2002.
The graph further prove that an amount of goods transported in the UK by water and pipeline can remained relatively constant at 40 million from 1974 to 1978. In addition to this, much rise can be seen in the number of things exported in the UK at over 60 by pipeline in remained years. Lastly, the amount of goods sent into the UK from rail was found showing a zig zag trend and never grow up to 40 million tonnes during the 26 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted in the UK by using four various ways road,water, rail and pipeline during 197...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , water
... the UK by using four various ways road,water, rail and pipeline during 1974 and 2002...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, likewise, moreover, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73631840796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47974892356 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547263681592 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1730823215 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.777777778 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342826723485 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136505953663 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998799188868 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186539135586 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854612055999 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.