The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso

Essay topics:

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts illustrate the percentage of British undergraduate students who were able to speak other languages apart from English in the year 2000 and 2010.

In overall, we can see that students having Spanish as second language accounted for the largest proportion in both years.

To begin with, there were just over one third of students speaking Spanish at one particular British University, followed by 20% of ones having no other language. Besides, French speakers, along with other bilingual students, made up to 15% of total for each figure. In addition, there were only one tenth of students who were able to use two more languages beside English in 2000.

Ten years later, still only 10% of German Speckers occured in both mentioned period, while the number of trilingual ones added 5% more. Moreover, the charts also observed a small increase in the amount of students who have been able to speak Spanish and French by 5% for each one. As other figures rose, there was a considerable decrease from 20% to 10% in the proportion of British students unable to speak other language between 2000 and 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... British University, followed by 20% of ones having no other language. Besides, Fren...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, moreover, second, so, still, third, while, apart from, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94210526316 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47749426626 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5828336353 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.375 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366804868852 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166248520378 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108955891435 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233267019199 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965932867008 0.0819641961636 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.