The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010.
The given circular charts reveal the information about the different languages speaks by students of British University in England in addition to english during the year 2000 and 2010. The data is calibroted in per centum, which is simple and coherent representated.
In the beginning, during the year 2000 languages speak by students other than English. However, 15% students were able to speak French only. Whereas a German language speak by students only 10%, while the maximum students had able to speak Spanish at 30%. Moving ahead, the 15% students had been speaking another languages . Furthermore, the students speak two other and no other language at 15% and 10% respectively.
In addition to this, in year 2010 the 10% students able to speak the French and German language only. Therefore, the 35% students speak Spanish. Whereas, the 20% and 15% students were speak another and two languages only. At the end, 10% students speak no other language.
Generally, it is evident that the maximum students speaks Spanish language only, while the minimum student speak German only.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ents had been speaking another languages . Furthermore, the students speak two oth...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the 35% students speak Spanish. Whereas, the 20% and 15% students were speak anot...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...Whereas, the 20% and 15% students were speak another and two languages only. At the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, therefore, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21590909091 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56278061666 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477272727273 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4840706908 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422297525723 0.215688989381 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193298788513 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926506233411 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27919076905 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763407935782 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.