The table below shows the result of a survey of average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten years pollution monitoring programme. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper lane at the beginning of 1999.
The tabular chart reveals the information about the average number of cars per hour from the working hour at three specific roads: harper lane, great York way, and long lane by ten year pollution monitoring programme in which traffic calming introduced in Harper lane at the beginning of 1999.
It can be seen that in the Harper lane during 1993 to 1994 increasing cars per hour basis 82 to 100. Apart and this, the numbers of cars increased 1995 till to 1996 had been 386 to 542. Moving forward, in 1997 or 1998 the cars were increment from 654 to 915. After that, in 1999 the rule of traffic calming was implemented for controlling the rush. As a result, the cars decline 1999 till to 2000 were 204 to 173. Furthermore, the cars were increased 2001 till to 2002 had been 178 to 193 respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that in road of great york start the year 1993 till yo 1994 had been incremented by 600 to 720. Moving forward, in next three years the cars had been little decreased from 700 about 630. After this, in again next year(1998, 1999, 2000) were some fluctuations like 695, 911, and 902. At the last two years the cars on roads are same at per hour basis data. The third and last road lone lane there the starting four years care had been increased from 400 to 800. Moving ahead, again next four years 1997 to 2000 cars were incremented 638 to 12000. At the end last two years the cars are equal.
Overall, it is evident that the maximum cars on roads according to per hour in lone lane road as well as the least cars had been the road of harper lane after implementing the traffic calming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'programme' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'programmes'.
Suggestion: programmes
...g lane by ten year pollution monitoring programme in which traffic calming introduced in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g forward, in 1997 or 1998 the cars were increment from 654 to 915. After that, i...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...02 had been 178 to 193 respectively. As far as trend was concerned that in road...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, third, well, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40666666667 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19215773966 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1605724561 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1333333333 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383795072492 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127084823395 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120096025449 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275849601555 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127353312905 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.