Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
"Music express that which cannot be said and on which it is impossible to be silent". Therefore, the musical instrument are described that the remedies for the stress as well as the resource to forget the worries. While the given topic is considered that, should the people think differently about the music gadgets; are the beneficial or not? Through this essay, I shall explode the dimensions of the essay and shape of my opinion by the end.
On the first side, there are mankind, who believe that the musical tools are beneficial in different ways? Broadly speaking, there are two main benefits of the musical instrument. The first and foremost important benefit of the musical gadget that is relaxation. Therefore, the relaxation is define that it is extremely source for the mind. As well as, some people are think to play the musical tools are stress buster resource apart from this the group of mankind think it is very effective way to concentrate the other activities. Secondly, the benefit of mankind musical gadget is show the hidden talent similarly the hidden talent of the humanity should be disclosed by the use of musical tools. According to this, when the people use the musical instrument so they show their interest on that activities and the talent well known by the society.
On the flip side, there are people who believe that the use of musical gadget is wastage of time? Nevertheless, there are two main reason behind this. Therefore, the first that overburden. Moving forward, this is the perception of the parents they think that it is the extra activity for their children. Apart from this, the elders think the children are not focus on their main course subject while others are think that there is no good career for the children in the musical gadgets. Similarly, the good career is possible only in main course subjects and the musical instrument only distract children from their goal in life.
Nevertheless, weighing both opinion, I believe that there is no single conclusion, still, I take this ground at an effective clap required both use of hands that their the use of musical instrument should not mandatory in schools and not pressurized by parents that season is depend upon only children themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'defined'.
Suggestion: defined
...elaxation. Therefore, the relaxation is define that it is extremely source for the min...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...laxation is define that it is extremely source for the mind. As well as, some people a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...r the mind. As well as, some people are think to play the musical tools are stress bu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity for their children. Apart from this, the elders think the children are not fo...
^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...ir main course subject while others are think that there is no good career for the ch...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, while, apart from, broadly speaking, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96569920844 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57312624835 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445910290237 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7062935742 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306863031829 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944455378183 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639856101352 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183163830725 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558873490179 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.