The given bar chart compares various reasons why do people travel in US in 2009. Furthermore, the pie chart below illustrates assortment of public concerns for travelling in US in 2009.
On the whole, as can be seen in the bar chart, the majority of people travelled for working and returning from working, whereas the least number of people travel in order to visit their friends or relatives. As for the pie chart, the major issue for travelling was the price of travel, while the space for pedestrians was the least concerned problem of the whole.
Turning to the detail, it is salient that the most predominant reason for travelling fell into the category of “to and from work,” accounting for nearly half of the entire population. Meanwhile, in terms of the visit friends/relatives, it observed the least percentage of people, comprising for merely 6%.
Last but not least, it is worth to note that the “lion shares” lied in the price of travel, taking up over one three of the six main problems of the travelling. The most striking point is that the space for pedestrians is the least cared issues, contributing only 6%, which is one six of that of “price of travel”.
- Countries（where there is high unemployment）most pupils should be offered only primary education, there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive 67
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...o the category of 'to and from work,' accounting for nearly half of the enti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, whereas, while, as for, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90071274755 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1443723369 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48671955242 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228581959296 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132693215044 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302777222297 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142608830583 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.