The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the different reasons given by people for travelling by cycle or car to work place.
Overall, most of the people who travel to work by cycling found it to be good for health and fitness and also beneficial for the environment as cycling causes no air pollution. On the other hand, major reason given by people who travelled by car to work was comfort.
Of the total people who cycled to their work place, one-third of them thought it is good for health and the exact same number gave the reason that cycles cause less pollution. Apart from these two popular reasons, 15% people thought that there is no parking problem in case of cycles whereas almost same amount of people reasoned out that cycling has no additional costs and is faster than driving (13% and 12% respectively).
Comfort was the main reason for people travelling to work by car (exactly 40%) while the second most famous reason was long distances to work, around 21% people thought that cycling to work places which are far is not convenient. The other three reasons which were almost equally likely among the people were that car is obviously faster than cycle, sometimes car is advantageous when you need to carry some stuff to work and it is safer than cycling. (14%, 14% and 11% respectively).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70796460177 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34970334364 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557522123894 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4120963143 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219748721579 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119243870275 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794699299075 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168558978287 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569029324761 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.