The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009.
The table shows the percentage of students going to four different Secondary schools (Specialist, Grammar, Voluntary-controlled and Community schools) in three time periods between 2000 and 2009.
Overall, Voluntary-controlled schools had the maximum participation by the students in the initial year but over the years it decreased quite significantly. Opposite to this, Community schools were one of the least attended schools by pupils in the starting year however, this trend changed dramatically till the last year where Community schools became the most famous among the children.
In the year 2000, almost half of the children attended voluntary-controlled schools however there was a significant drop in percentage of students in the next 8 years where only one-fifth of the students were interested in Voluntary-controlled schools. In contrast to this, Specialist schools saw a very insignificant decrease of only 2% over the years and in 2009, one-tenth of the pupils went to Specialist schools.
Students enrolled in Grammar schools dropped to half the number in 2009 as compared to 24% in the initial year. But on the contrary, Community schools showed almost threefold increase in first four years where nearly one-third of the children attended their schools. This trend further continued and the number of students in Community schools almost doubled from 2005 to 2009 where it had around 60% students attending their schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, third, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53603603604 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31889067394 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.543911139 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.625 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256454370795 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131330621615 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738018051804 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187474160628 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720888814191 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.